The Heart Goes Last, Margaret Atwood
Why Atwood's most recent novel is an exciting read that just needed to pick a path and stick to it. One minor spoiler about a woman fucking a teddy bear (not that relevant, I promise).
Now, I was pleased to see that this novel surprised me in that it wasn't the expected that ended up being the novel's epicentre. Instead it turns you towards what Atwood believes to be the real hell, other people. I really enjoyed Stan and Charmaine, who aren't some idealistic heroes, but instead regular pawns in this twisted game of capitalism and carnage. You love and hate them both for their gullible lovable natures, but also understand that you would probably be the same in that situation (other than some moments, you'll see what I mean when you read).
My main problem with the novel was that it didn't have the ideological directness that Atwood often drives her novels with. All of them indicate problems with several facets of 21st century society, however each has a focus. The Handmaid's Tale takes gender, Oryx and Crake takes the environment. The Heart Goes Last can't quite seem to decide its driving force, and so at some times feels confused. I lost interest towards the end when it seemed to be going round in a circle of who to trust, and frankly, I just didn't understand why there was a woman sexually attracted to a teddy bear. I really didn't see the point or understand how that was possible or relevant. But maybe that was the point? I don't know.
I am not criticising Atwood's style as it remains sound throughout the text. I always laugh out loud when I read her novels, especially Stan in this one in particular. He's a golden character with moronic wit that resonates with me a lot. Overall I just needed to be told exactly where the novel was going a bit more. Maybe that's my lacking ability to open my mind to Atwood's newer narratives, or maybe it's Atwood getting bored of the same spiel.
Comments
Post a Comment