Hystopia, by David Means (Review)
Means does not disappoint with his debut novel Hystopia. The story itself is the
creation of a fictitious survivor of the Vietnam war, Eugene Allen, who’s voice
frames the novel in a collection of Author’s notes whilst some Editor’s notes
offer explanation of his character. Eugene has committed suicide prior to the
discovery of his novel, so from the very outset we are immersed in the
traumatic effects of the war. I feel Eugene could have had more of a place in
the structure of the text. Half way through I forgot that I was reading a novel
within a novel and so the effect of this technique was reduced. The novel
within the novel takes place in a world where Kennedy has survived several
assassination attempts and has entered his third term whilst the Vietnam War
rages on. The chapters alternate between the lives of 2 couples. Wendy and
Singleton are agents on the hunt for a murderer named Rake. Meanwhile the
counter-narrative follows Meg, Rake’s hostage, and Hank who is set on freeing
her from Rake’s control. What complicates issues is the process of enfolding;
enfolding is the government’s new way of ‘curing’ shell shock. By using a drug
called tripizoid ex-veterans can suppress their traumatic memories through this
process. The treatment however is never complete, and so Hank, Meg and
Singleton are all ‘drifting around with the pivotal points of their lives
buried’.
The novel effectively put’s itself in the cannon of
dystopian fiction both through elusions and standing out from the crowd. Wendy
and Singletons relationship has an unmistakable reminiscence to 1984’s Winston
and Julie. Moreover, the issue of trusting our narrators both in fiction and
the media is embedded within the plot. Thus the narrative signals a
relationship with texts that have come before which strengthens the effect of
this ‘hystopian’ world.
The text’s concern with trauma, combined with the free-indirect
style, means we see deep into the character’s souls. This close look into the
psyche of the individuals through some very disturbing sequences of stream of
consciousness makes the novel stand out from the crowd. It is not uncomfortably
regimented like Orwell, but instead erratic and, at times, hard to follow due
to its complexity. This complexity at times is ineffective, slightly exposing
David Means’s inexperience with the novel form. The stream of consciousness,
only a few times, felt like overkill that slowed the pace rather than
contributing to the tone.
Overall I was impressed by the text. Although at times I was
lost, I never wanted to stop reading. Means offers an insight into Vietnam that
has neutrality and simultaneously exudes compassion for the people it concerns.
Comments
Post a Comment